I saw this one with my boys yesterday, and I'm glad I did. It's funny and well-written. Plenty of laughs for the grown-ups and the kids alike. The story follows Gru, this apparent supervillain who has been outclassed by an up-and-coming villain named Vector (Vector is the Apple to Gru's PC -- you can definitely see that in everything Vector does). Gru wants to reclaim his position as top supervillain by stealing the Moon, and, as part of that scheme, he adopts three orphaned little girls (sisters -- the cerebral oldest sis, the quasi-tomboy middle, and the cutsie pie youngest). Gru's villainous heart is, of course, softened by the introduction of these three kids in his world. It's kind of a nod to good parenting, I think -- that kids bring fun and love to your life in ways that a job never will.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_rUbqbhUEQ
Anyway, the animation is crisp, the characters are amusing -- Gru's a stitch, and the girls are dangerously cute, and the story is light and entertaining. Universal is in Pixar's shadow, but this is a great addition to their portfolio. I can't wait to get it on DVD.
Showing posts with label Family Movie. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Family Movie. Show all posts
Monday, July 26, 2010
Sunday, July 25, 2010
Despicable Me (2010)
I'll review this one tomorrow. A lot of fun, well-written, good times!
**** (out of five)
**** (out of five)
Friday, July 23, 2010
Hercules (1997)
I watched Disney's "Hercules" with my boys the other night, and they seemed to greatly enjoy it, and, while I'm not a particular fan of Disney's movies, it was enjoyable enough. Good performances from the actors, reasonably good animation, and a typically Disneyfied storyline made it light fun.
That said, it's curious to see the Disney cultural meatgrinder go to work on the Greek myths. I mean, where to start? The saucy Megara (she looks hot) stole much of the show (but not too much, mind you -- it's Disney, after all), but I watched her happy ending with Herc and thought "Lordy, she's doomed." given that I know what happened to the "real" Megara when she hooked up with Hercules. NOT a happy ending for her or their kids. Of course, the cuddly, doting Hera was a total pie on the face of Greek mythology -- I mean, Hera? HERA? The original Olympian shrew bar none? A loving mother figure to Hercules? She wasn't even his mom, and what's more, Hera hated Hercules more than she hated most of Zeus's bastard children!
What else? How about the Judeo-Christian ethic evident in Hercules's growth as a hero -- Zeus saying something like "Being strong's not enough; what matters is the strength of your heart." Or something like that, in the context of his love and self-sacrifice regarding Megara. I mean, obviously, it's DISNEY, so they'll hew toward mawkishness whenever possible, but to invert the Greek heroic tradition to serve a Judeo-Christian ethic amused me to no end -- ancient Greeks would've choked at such a representation of Hercules.
The Titans were curiously rendered -- two of them resembled Norse Giants (Ymir and Surtur, if memory serves -- ice and fire giants). They certainly looked impressive enough, but it was odd to me, seeing these grand Norse Giants somehow standing in as Greek Titans. Somehow, I can forgive the gospel-singing Muses (they were entertaining enough), but the hash they made out of the myths was perplexing.
All the same, taking it unseriously, it was enjoyable on its own merits, but Zeus help any kid who gets their understanding of the Greek myths by way of Disney! It was pretty to look at, and fun to listen to (and James Woods was having a blast as Hades, clearly), but I felt like I needed to inoculate my boys against Disneyfication by reading actual Greek myths to them!
That said, it's curious to see the Disney cultural meatgrinder go to work on the Greek myths. I mean, where to start? The saucy Megara (she looks hot) stole much of the show (but not too much, mind you -- it's Disney, after all), but I watched her happy ending with Herc and thought "Lordy, she's doomed." given that I know what happened to the "real" Megara when she hooked up with Hercules. NOT a happy ending for her or their kids. Of course, the cuddly, doting Hera was a total pie on the face of Greek mythology -- I mean, Hera? HERA? The original Olympian shrew bar none? A loving mother figure to Hercules? She wasn't even his mom, and what's more, Hera hated Hercules more than she hated most of Zeus's bastard children!
What else? How about the Judeo-Christian ethic evident in Hercules's growth as a hero -- Zeus saying something like "Being strong's not enough; what matters is the strength of your heart." Or something like that, in the context of his love and self-sacrifice regarding Megara. I mean, obviously, it's DISNEY, so they'll hew toward mawkishness whenever possible, but to invert the Greek heroic tradition to serve a Judeo-Christian ethic amused me to no end -- ancient Greeks would've choked at such a representation of Hercules.
The Titans were curiously rendered -- two of them resembled Norse Giants (Ymir and Surtur, if memory serves -- ice and fire giants). They certainly looked impressive enough, but it was odd to me, seeing these grand Norse Giants somehow standing in as Greek Titans. Somehow, I can forgive the gospel-singing Muses (they were entertaining enough), but the hash they made out of the myths was perplexing.
All the same, taking it unseriously, it was enjoyable on its own merits, but Zeus help any kid who gets their understanding of the Greek myths by way of Disney! It was pretty to look at, and fun to listen to (and James Woods was having a blast as Hades, clearly), but I felt like I needed to inoculate my boys against Disneyfication by reading actual Greek myths to them!
Monday, May 10, 2010
How To Train Your Dragon
I took the boys to see "How To Train Your Dragon" (or whatever it's called). It was cute. The boys seemed to enjoy it. As ever, CGI graphics just get better and better -- rich details like the pebbled hides of the dragons just come to life. It was rated PG, and I think that was, perhaps, justified -- there's nothing scary in it or anything, but there are lots of explosions, fires, the dragons, and what-not. The protagonist ("Hiccup") strikes me as a very Gen X protagonist -- just something in his manner feels that way to me, which is kind of funny to see in a kids movie -- like they know that Gen Xers are parents, now, so they craft a kiddy protagonist that kind of plays to things we can relate to (sort of like how so many of the older kiddy movies had gratuitous Elvis references -- something for the Boomers to wink and nod to) -- but it's funny, because Hiccup is sarcastic and facetious, and so I think any Xer parent taking their kid to it'll be like "Yeah, I'd probably say the same thing."
The aerial scenes are lovely, quite breath-taking on the big screen -- the heavenly clouds, the lovely countrysides, the swooping dragons. All of that. Good stuff. You really felt the propulsive motion of those sequences.
I think the Vikings portrayed in it must be from the Orkney Islands, because they have Scots accents (I know, right? Vikings with Scottish accents? I consoled myself with thinking they were somewhere near the Orkneys). Unless, somehow, Scots accents are seen as inherently barbaric. Not sure, not sure.
But I think the movie had a nice balance of character development and certainly a curiously pacifistic message that jumps out at you in this time of our country fighting two wars abroad (remember them?) -- and one moment that particularly makes you think of today's new reality for survivors of wars.
I won't reveal any plot points or surprises. I'd not say the movie was up there with "Up" or "Wall-E" necessarily, but it was a good effort, and it certainly kept my attention.
One (big) complaint: Enough with the 3-D movies already -- we know you're doing it just to rack up box office receipts, you bastards. Not EVERY movie need be 3-D. It set me back $33 to see this movie -- and that was at a matinee.
The aerial scenes are lovely, quite breath-taking on the big screen -- the heavenly clouds, the lovely countrysides, the swooping dragons. All of that. Good stuff. You really felt the propulsive motion of those sequences.
I think the Vikings portrayed in it must be from the Orkney Islands, because they have Scots accents (I know, right? Vikings with Scottish accents? I consoled myself with thinking they were somewhere near the Orkneys). Unless, somehow, Scots accents are seen as inherently barbaric. Not sure, not sure.
But I think the movie had a nice balance of character development and certainly a curiously pacifistic message that jumps out at you in this time of our country fighting two wars abroad (remember them?) -- and one moment that particularly makes you think of today's new reality for survivors of wars.
I won't reveal any plot points or surprises. I'd not say the movie was up there with "Up" or "Wall-E" necessarily, but it was a good effort, and it certainly kept my attention.
One (big) complaint: Enough with the 3-D movies already -- we know you're doing it just to rack up box office receipts, you bastards. Not EVERY movie need be 3-D. It set me back $33 to see this movie -- and that was at a matinee.
The Fantastic Mr. Fox
I watched "The Fantastic Mr. Fox" at long last, and enjoyed it, almost despite it being a West Anderson movie. I say that because Anderson's made a career out of dishing out a certain type of ambiance in his works -- trying out-Salinger Salinger, is how I typically put it. Not so much with "Bottle Rocket," but from "Rushmore" onward, he ladles that kind of quirkily patrician kind of world that conjures up the Glass Family that so occupied Salinger. J.D. Salinger's taut style of writing certainly influenced me in the 90s, when I read most of his books, but to see it served up onscreen (albeit somewhat adulterated by way of Anderson) is, somehow, I don't know -- arch?
He must be a fun and/or indulgent director, as he has his usual band of actors who appear eager to work with him again and again (Tim Burton has that same quality).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spCknVcaSHg
Anyway, "...Fox" is fun and enjoyable because while you can't for a moment ignore that it's a Wes Anderson movie, the stop-motion and Roald Dahl source material for it renders it palatable and charming. For example, having George Clooney voice Mr. Fox might seem questionable, since the man is so busy being (or trying to be) Cary Grant Lite that he can't occupy any scene without derailing it -- but since it was just his voice, it lets the character of Mr. Fox come through more than it otherwise would have. Quite the opposite with Bill Murray as the Mr. Badger -- I love Bill Murray, but he kind of overwhelms his character a bit -- you can just SEE Murray in the character so much, which amuses me. Bill Murray is so Bill Murray that even as just a voice, he possesses anything he touches.
The plot of the movie pits the Foxes against three farmers, and it escalates through the course of the story (and, I think, drags a bit in the third act -- I found myself getting a bit fidgety, and being surprised that it's only 87 minutes long -- it felt a bit longer owing to that third act). But it's dryly funny and clever and cute and is a cool effort. My boys loved it and wanted to watch it again and again. I think Anderson was smart to avoid lapsing completely into self-parody with it -- the venue change let him do his thing without it appearing that he was doing his same old thing (and yet, yes, he was doing his same old thing, but I didn't care, because I enjoyed the movie a great deal). The power of stop-motion puppetry! Never, ever underestimate the power of puppets, where kids are concerned!
Oh, and I can instantly irk B1 just by imitating Mr. Fox's call-sign that he does (you can hear it at :04 in the trailer linked above). I do it and he says (in this admonishing, irritated tone) "Dadddddyy. Don't. Do. That!"
He must be a fun and/or indulgent director, as he has his usual band of actors who appear eager to work with him again and again (Tim Burton has that same quality).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spCknVcaSHg
Anyway, "...Fox" is fun and enjoyable because while you can't for a moment ignore that it's a Wes Anderson movie, the stop-motion and Roald Dahl source material for it renders it palatable and charming. For example, having George Clooney voice Mr. Fox might seem questionable, since the man is so busy being (or trying to be) Cary Grant Lite that he can't occupy any scene without derailing it -- but since it was just his voice, it lets the character of Mr. Fox come through more than it otherwise would have. Quite the opposite with Bill Murray as the Mr. Badger -- I love Bill Murray, but he kind of overwhelms his character a bit -- you can just SEE Murray in the character so much, which amuses me. Bill Murray is so Bill Murray that even as just a voice, he possesses anything he touches.
The plot of the movie pits the Foxes against three farmers, and it escalates through the course of the story (and, I think, drags a bit in the third act -- I found myself getting a bit fidgety, and being surprised that it's only 87 minutes long -- it felt a bit longer owing to that third act). But it's dryly funny and clever and cute and is a cool effort. My boys loved it and wanted to watch it again and again. I think Anderson was smart to avoid lapsing completely into self-parody with it -- the venue change let him do his thing without it appearing that he was doing his same old thing (and yet, yes, he was doing his same old thing, but I didn't care, because I enjoyed the movie a great deal). The power of stop-motion puppetry! Never, ever underestimate the power of puppets, where kids are concerned!
Oh, and I can instantly irk B1 just by imitating Mr. Fox's call-sign that he does (you can hear it at :04 in the trailer linked above). I do it and he says (in this admonishing, irritated tone) "Dadddddyy. Don't. Do. That!"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
